Syria, it's a bit of a touchy subject just now.
Personally, I have not been following this as closely as I should have. But
I am glad that the UK has decided, for now, not to get involved.
The problem we have, as outsiders looking in, is that we only hear what we
are allowed to hear. We do not have any evidence (yet) of who done what. What
if we went in, all guns blazing, and brought down a leader who did not use
chemicals on his own people, when in fact it was the 'rebels'? Same rebels who
were counting on Western Intervention to further them.
On the other hand though, who IS going to go help all the innocent people
who are being chemically wiped out?